B+

ninar.ai

Item: ninar.ai
Rating: 89
Author: wmcp.sh

https://ninar.ai/mcp

89/100 · MCP Trust Grade · checked 5h ago · MCP 2024-11-05

✓ Watched since 2026-06-03 — behavioral baseline locked. We re-check this server's tool surface on a schedule; if it adds, removes, or silently rewrites a tool (rug-pull), we record it.

What it offers — 5 tools · Maps & Geo

get_latest_score

Get the AI Visibility Index (0-100) for the signed-in user's most recently scanned brand, broken down by engine. Requires a free Ninar account (no cre

scan_visibility

Run an AI visibility scan for a brand. Pass `city` for a local-business check (ChatGPT + Gemini, city-scoped). Omit `city` for a multi-engine GEO scan

list_content_gaps

List AI-generated content suggestions (FAQs, differentiators, use cases, about copy) the signed-in user can publish to close visibility gaps found in

generate_content

Generate AI-optimized content (FAQ, about copy, use cases, differentiators) for the gaps in your latest scan. Returns full content text inline — no ne

audit_brand_visibility

Run a System of Record adjudication on an entity surfaced by an AI engine (e.g. is 'Banner Life' a valid PMI competitor to Enact?). Uses dual-model co

Spec conformance20%100

✓ initialize → protocolVersion 2024-11-05
✓ initialize HTTP 200
✓ unknown method → -32601
✓ tools/list → 5 tools
✓ every tool has name + inputSchema

Security (OWASP MCP)30%100

5 tools scanned
no injection markup
no secret-path refs

Reliability / performance20%84

single-probe latency 906ms (PRELIMINARY — continuous uptime/p95 from proxy telemetry lands in v2)

Tool hygiene15%56

60% of tools have typed inputSchema
0/5 declare outputSchema
no unannotated destructive tools

Transparency / provenance15%90

HTTPS ✓
RFC 9728 oauth-protected-resource metadata ✓
advertises protocol 2024-11-05

Observed behavior

No proxied traffic observed for this host yet. Connect it at /connect and its grade gains a measured Reliability score + per-tool behavioral evidence — the half a static scan can't produce.

Findings

No blocking issues found in the static + spec checks.

Grade another server

We re-grade ninar.ai on a schedule and alert your Slack/webhook the moment its tools change or its grade drops — rug-pull insurance for the connection.

Share this report card

A 1200×630 card with the grade + audit — drop it in a post, Slack, or your repo.

MCP Trust report card — ninar.ai grade B+

Share on X Open card image

https://wmcp.sh/mcp/grade/ninar.ai

Embed this grade

A live badge — it re-verifies itself and shows current stability. Static scorecards can't. Paste it in your README or site to show users you're independently audited.

Markdown (for your README)

[![MCP Trust Grade B+](https://wmcp.sh/mcp/grade/ninar.ai/badge.svg)](https://wmcp.sh/mcp/grade/ninar.ai)

HTML

<a href="https://wmcp.sh/mcp/grade/ninar.ai"><img src="https://wmcp.sh/mcp/grade/ninar.ai/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Grade B+ · wmcp.sh"></a>

Agents: check this before connecting

Add the wmcp.sh trust oracle as an MCP server and call grade_mcp_server / check_mcp_drift in your agent's pre-connection gate:

https://wmcp.sh/mcp/trust

How this grade is computed. An open, independent rubric — Spec conformance (20%), Security mapped to the OWASP MCP Top 10 (30%), Reliability (20%), Tool hygiene (15%), Transparency (15%) — run by connecting to the server and inspecting its real MCP surface. The grade is free and identical whether or not the operator pays. v1 uses static + spec signals from a single connection; continuous uptime, real latency, and annotation-truthing (declared readOnly vs observed behavior) layer on via the wmcp.sh proxy.